If a child cannot consent to taking puberty blockers their loving parent can consent in their stead. That is the outcome of the decision of the High Court, earlier this morning, in the case of AB v Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust (full decision below), the first case funded by Good Law Projectâ€™s Trans Defence Fund.
The effect of the decision in the Bell case earlier this year, when read together with the practice hitherto of the Tavistock not to accept parental consent, was that even when a specialist doctor wanted to prescribe puberty blockers, a child wanted to receive puberty blockers, and their parents believed puberty blockers were in the best interests of the child, an application would still need to be made to the High Court.
Good Law Projectâ€™s lawyers were unable to identify any precedent in English law for this situation. What role is there for a judge â€“ what expertise would they bring or function would they fulfil â€“ in circumstances where the child, parents and doctor all agreed on the right course of therapeutic treatment?