This is the latest version of the Genderbread Person, an attempt to clear up the differences between gender identity, sexual/romantic attraction and anatomical sex â€“ differences that many self-appointed experts seem unwilling or unable to understand. The reason there are multiple versions is because it’s under constant review to make it as clear and understandable as possible.
The diagram (PDF version and more details available from here) works pretty well without the key, I think: identity is who you are, attraction is who you love/fancy, expression is how you present yourself and sex is what body you have. But the key goes into a bit more detail.
For what it’s worth, my genderbread person has a gender identity and gender expression that are significantly more female than male, my anatomical sex is more male than female (but it’s becoming more female due to HRT), my sex assigned at birth was male and my sexual/romantic attraction is towards women and femininity.
As the diagram’s creator, SamÂ Killermann, explains:
Look around. Listen inside yourself. Think about everything youâ€™ve learned, been told, or absorbed. Maybe you wouldnâ€™t name these components â€œidentity,â€ â€œexpression,â€ â€œsex,â€ and â€œattraction,â€ but you no doubt recognize their existence.
You feel a certain way, inside. You have a personality, preferences, predispositions. You also look certain ways, dress certain ways, and your body is built in certain ways. Youâ€™ve likely noticed many of the ways that society (and your peers, and likely yourself) puts many of those aspects of yourself through a gendered litmus test: pink or blue? And you can surely name ways you, or someone you care about, has felt pressure, discomfort, ease, friction, and/or liberation in light of that.
…Thatâ€™s what the Genderbread Person is helping us to understand. Itâ€™s trying to map all of those amorphous feelings, noticings, and pressures to simple language and visuals.
I think Sam’s done a good job.