It’ll be interesting to see how it fares. A long long time ago Waterstones had its own site, but Amazon stomped it (and they ended up with their own branded section on Amazon). It’s a bold move, but so far at least I really like it.
david
Sadly enough I knew about this. Whoever it is that owns Waterstones (HMV?) has decided to cut the amazon deal and go it alone.
Comments
0 responses to “Waterstones”
It is indeed. Lovely, that is.
It’ll be interesting to see how it fares. A long long time ago Waterstones had its own site, but Amazon stomped it (and they ended up with their own branded section on Amazon). It’s a bold move, but so far at least I really like it.
Sadly enough I knew about this. Whoever it is that owns Waterstones (HMV?) has decided to cut the amazon deal and go it alone.
It is pretty nice. Anyone know what the .do extension means about the backend? (Lazy, I know).
It indicates a Java framework, apparently. At least it’s not asp.