<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing is a terrible name for a search engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2439/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2439</link>
	<description>Freelance writer Gary Marshall on technology, music, Macs and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bing crosby</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2439/comment-page-1#comment-13678</link>
		<dc:creator>bing crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2439#comment-13678</guid>
		<description>Bing is a HORRIBLE search engine.

It&#039;s the same old MSN search engine.

The people at Microsoft will never get it right.

Change Bing to Search.com. And put MORE, not less results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is a HORRIBLE search engine.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same old MSN search engine.</p>
<p>The people at Microsoft will never get it right.</p>
<p>Change Bing to Search.com. And put MORE, not less results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2439/comment-page-1#comment-13610</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2439#comment-13610</guid>
		<description>Oh, thanks for that. I hadn&#039;t heard of webmaster problems - I&#039;ll go and check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thanks for that. I hadn&#8217;t heard of webmaster problems &#8211; I&#8217;ll go and check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2439/comment-page-1#comment-13609</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2439#comment-13609</guid>
		<description>Hi Gary,

Not only is it a terrible name (bing) but it appears that webmasters cannot get their sites indexed. There are some serious issues with this and the response from Microsoft tech&#039;s (support forums) when addressing this is that most webmasters don&#039;t have a clue? or they need to do this and do that, even when most of these webmasters are indexed well on Google, Yahoo etc. This is a very offensive way to respond to indexing issues when the problem lies with Microsoft. If websites cannot be indexed because of their own technical issues (Microsoft),&quot;bing&quot; searches are a waste of time. The question arises is how could they have screwed up so bad? as just a few years ago they were a viable contender in search technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary,</p>
<p>Not only is it a terrible name (bing) but it appears that webmasters cannot get their sites indexed. There are some serious issues with this and the response from Microsoft tech&#8217;s (support forums) when addressing this is that most webmasters don&#8217;t have a clue? or they need to do this and do that, even when most of these webmasters are indexed well on Google, Yahoo etc. This is a very offensive way to respond to indexing issues when the problem lies with Microsoft. If websites cannot be indexed because of their own technical issues (Microsoft),&#8221;bing&#8221; searches are a waste of time. The question arises is how could they have screwed up so bad? as just a few years ago they were a viable contender in search technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Krouwel</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2439/comment-page-1#comment-13561</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Krouwel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2439#comment-13561</guid>
		<description>Good old Microsoft, generators also of Whinge, Wince and C hash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good old Microsoft, generators also of Whinge, Wince and C hash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

