<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some interesting articles I found on the internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030</link>
	<description>Freelance journalist Gary Marshall on technology, the Internet, music, Macs and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:48:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12858</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12858</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&gt; does anybody other than film buffs watch movie extras?&lt;/i&gt;

I do.  I don&#039;t know whether I qualify as a film buff.  Yeah, I suppose I probably am.  Albeit one who doesn&#039;t watch many films any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&gt; does anybody other than film buffs watch movie extras?</i></p>
<p>I do.  I don&#8217;t know whether I qualify as a film buff.  Yeah, I suppose I probably am.  Albeit one who doesn&#8217;t watch many films any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12854</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12854</guid>
		<description>Gary: astroturfing.

ScotRail comes to mind.  God knows the staff do put up with some abuse, but one of the main things I love about self-employment is not having to play the idiotic game of &quot;How many Scotrail staff does it take to manually inspect a ticket while giving you a shovelfull of attitude in the space of one hour&quot; twice a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary: astroturfing.</p>
<p>ScotRail comes to mind.  God knows the staff do put up with some abuse, but one of the main things I love about self-employment is not having to play the idiotic game of &#8220;How many Scotrail staff does it take to manually inspect a ticket while giving you a shovelfull of attitude in the space of one hour&#8221; twice a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12852</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12852</guid>
		<description>@In Actual Fact:
&gt; I’ve also developed a ’sod it’ attitude to IE6

From a punter point of view, all I care about is that I can access a site - I hate browser sniffers much more than I hate layout issues. IE7&#039;s been out long enough for a &quot;sod IE6&quot; attitude to be perfectly reasonable, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@In Actual Fact:<br />
> I’ve also developed a ’sod it’ attitude to IE6</p>
<p>From a punter point of view, all I care about is that I can access a site &#8211; I hate browser sniffers much more than I hate layout issues. IE7&#8217;s been out long enough for a &#8220;sod IE6&#8243; attitude to be perfectly reasonable, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12850</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12850</guid>
		<description>@mupwangle:
&gt; I don’t reckon that any HDTV stuff is worth it below 50″ in an average size living room. 

I&#039;d agree. You&#039;re right about HD video recording: i&#039;ve defaulted to 720 because I genuinely can&#039;t see any difference between it and 1080, plus I get more room on my camcorder memory cards. That&#039;s partly the problem with Blu-Ray: my telly simply isn&#039;t big enough for there to be any substantive difference between a plain old DVD (never mind upscaling) and Blu-Ray. It&#039;s hardly moving from VHS to DVD.

@Squander two:
&gt; I suppose we’ll shortly see loads of extras on Blu-Ray releases that aren’t on their DVD equivalents

I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right, but does anybody other than film buffs watch movie extras? I did when I used to review DVDs for work, but since then I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve watched a single one.

I do think with Blu-Ray it comes down to price versus what you get. And what you get is a fractional improvement on DVD, so the price should be fractionally higher. Supermarkets etc have created a situation where DVD is £12ish, £15 for a really big title. Blu-ray at nearly double that is just daft.

&gt; I simply never get that “Need to upgrade this technology” feeling with DVD.

Me too. DVD - particularly with an upscaling player - is good enough. To me Blu-Ray sits in the same camp as Super Audio CD: impressive technically, but I&#039;ve no interest in paying any more for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mupwangle:<br />
> I don’t reckon that any HDTV stuff is worth it below 50″ in an average size living room. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree. You&#8217;re right about HD video recording: i&#8217;ve defaulted to 720 because I genuinely can&#8217;t see any difference between it and 1080, plus I get more room on my camcorder memory cards. That&#8217;s partly the problem with Blu-Ray: my telly simply isn&#8217;t big enough for there to be any substantive difference between a plain old DVD (never mind upscaling) and Blu-Ray. It&#8217;s hardly moving from VHS to DVD.</p>
<p>@Squander two:<br />
> I suppose we’ll shortly see loads of extras on Blu-Ray releases that aren’t on their DVD equivalents</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right, but does anybody other than film buffs watch movie extras? I did when I used to review DVDs for work, but since then I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve watched a single one.</p>
<p>I do think with Blu-Ray it comes down to price versus what you get. And what you get is a fractional improvement on DVD, so the price should be fractionally higher. Supermarkets etc have created a situation where DVD is £12ish, £15 for a really big title. Blu-ray at nearly double that is just daft.</p>
<p>> I simply never get that “Need to upgrade this technology” feeling with DVD.</p>
<p>Me too. DVD &#8211; particularly with an upscaling player &#8211; is good enough. To me Blu-Ray sits in the same camp as Super Audio CD: impressive technically, but I&#8217;ve no interest in paying any more for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12849</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12849</guid>
		<description>@heather:
&gt; nice article in .net, as always.

Why, thank you. What am I blabbing about this month? Is it the fitness club/lawyers one? There&#039;s a bit of a gap between writing &#039;em and them hitting print so I lose track...

&gt; and which ironically had the most blatantly abusive and aggressive staff I had encountered in years. 

I&#039;ve noticed that too. Naturally I&#039;d never condone abusing staff, but the signs do tend to appear in places where you&#039;re treated like absolute shite - jobcentres, airports, transport in general, government offices, ikea... for every drunken arse abusing people for no good reason there&#039;s someone at the end of their tether from dealing with a kafkaesque organisation who thinks that having a few scummy customers mean they should operate on the assumption that every customer is scum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@heather:<br />
> nice article in .net, as always.</p>
<p>Why, thank you. What am I blabbing about this month? Is it the fitness club/lawyers one? There&#8217;s a bit of a gap between writing &#8216;em and them hitting print so I lose track&#8230;</p>
<p>> and which ironically had the most blatantly abusive and aggressive staff I had encountered in years. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that too. Naturally I&#8217;d never condone abusing staff, but the signs do tend to appear in places where you&#8217;re treated like absolute shite &#8211; jobcentres, airports, transport in general, government offices, ikea&#8230; for every drunken arse abusing people for no good reason there&#8217;s someone at the end of their tether from dealing with a kafkaesque organisation who thinks that having a few scummy customers mean they should operate on the assumption that every customer is scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12848</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12848</guid>
		<description>OT but - nice article in .net, as always.

It brings to mind my recent observation of a workplace which was wallpapered in posters with warnings that &quot;we do not tolerate abuse and aggression against our staff&quot; and which ironically had the most blatantly abusive and aggressive staff I had encountered in years.  The way they were acting like petty thugs towards quiet, polite, and innocent customers, who were left standing there stunned at the way they were being treated, was disgusting.  It&#039;s the abuser playing the victim, letting the world know that they reserve the right to dish it out, but not to take it, and that they&#039;ll ring the police if you dare to call them on their game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT but &#8211; nice article in .net, as always.</p>
<p>It brings to mind my recent observation of a workplace which was wallpapered in posters with warnings that &#8220;we do not tolerate abuse and aggression against our staff&#8221; and which ironically had the most blatantly abusive and aggressive staff I had encountered in years.  The way they were acting like petty thugs towards quiet, polite, and innocent customers, who were left standing there stunned at the way they were being treated, was disgusting.  It&#8217;s the abuser playing the victim, letting the world know that they reserve the right to dish it out, but not to take it, and that they&#8217;ll ring the police if you dare to call them on their game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Actual Fact</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12845</link>
		<dc:creator>In Actual Fact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12845</guid>
		<description>Heather, Squander Two: I&#039;ve also developed a &#039;sod it&#039; attitude to IE6 - be it bundled as Dell or BTYahoo Internet or whatever - I spent god knows how long producing workarounds so that things would display in IE6 as well as Firefox and Safari and then to not have them work in IE7 was somewhat annoying. Add on to that clients who want a &lt;em&gt;slightly&lt;/em&gt; different shade of purple, but can&#039;t tell which &quot;until they see it&quot; and aren&#039;t going to listen to any of this nonsense about colour calibration on different monitors or what the font will look like when it&#039;s not in a .psd mock-up and it&#039;s enough to make me go back to genetic engineering (the job applications are in the post).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather, Squander Two: I&#8217;ve also developed a &#8217;sod it&#8217; attitude to IE6 &#8211; be it bundled as Dell or BTYahoo Internet or whatever &#8211; I spent god knows how long producing workarounds so that things would display in IE6 as well as Firefox and Safari and then to not have them work in IE7 was somewhat annoying. Add on to that clients who want a <em>slightly</em> different shade of purple, but can&#8217;t tell which &#8220;until they see it&#8221; and aren&#8217;t going to listen to any of this nonsense about colour calibration on different monitors or what the font will look like when it&#8217;s not in a .psd mock-up and it&#8217;s enough to make me go back to genetic engineering (the job applications are in the post).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12843</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12843</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;People with 50&quot; or larger TVs&lt;/i&gt; definitely isn&#039;t the market Blu-Ray are trying to sell to.  I suppose we&#039;ll shortly see loads of extras on Blu-Ray releases that aren&#039;t on their DVD equivalents -- same technique as they used to sell CD to people who saw no quality-based reason to switch from vinyl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>People with 50&#8243; or larger TVs</i> definitely isn&#8217;t the market Blu-Ray are trying to sell to.  I suppose we&#8217;ll shortly see loads of extras on Blu-Ray releases that aren&#8217;t on their DVD equivalents &#8212; same technique as they used to sell CD to people who saw no quality-based reason to switch from vinyl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mupwangle</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12842</link>
		<dc:creator>mupwangle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12842</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;I’ve bought a huge bloody great flat-screen TV now — I forget just how big, 42″ I think — and I still don’t see any problem with DVD

That&#039;s probably because your idea of big and other people&#039;s doesn&#039;t match.  

Other than with games (since you tend to sit right in front of the screen, so you do see a difference since you&#039;re only a foot or two away), I don&#039;t reckon that any HDTV stuff is worth it below 50&quot; in an average size living room.  I&#039;ve tried comparing 720p with 576i pictures and, unless i&#039;m about 18&quot; or less from the screen on a 42&quot; TV, the difference is neglible.  Also if you&#039;ve got a modern HDMI compliant DVD player, it is probably already upscaling to HDTV resolutions which, although there is no more picture detail, does get rid of a lot of noise.  Generally, on a 32&quot; HDTV most people would not be able to tell the difference between a Blu-ray, HD-DVD or upscaled DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;I’ve bought a huge bloody great flat-screen TV now — I forget just how big, 42″ I think — and I still don’t see any problem with DVD</p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably because your idea of big and other people&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t match.  </p>
<p>Other than with games (since you tend to sit right in front of the screen, so you do see a difference since you&#8217;re only a foot or two away), I don&#8217;t reckon that any HDTV stuff is worth it below 50&#8243; in an average size living room.  I&#8217;ve tried comparing 720p with 576i pictures and, unless i&#8217;m about 18&#8243; or less from the screen on a 42&#8243; TV, the difference is neglible.  Also if you&#8217;ve got a modern HDMI compliant DVD player, it is probably already upscaling to HDTV resolutions which, although there is no more picture detail, does get rid of a lot of noise.  Generally, on a 32&#8243; HDTV most people would not be able to tell the difference between a Blu-ray, HD-DVD or upscaled DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12841</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12841</guid>
		<description>Yeah, haven&#039;t done any Web design in ages, but resolved quite some time ago to put in an &quot;IE may display this weirdly and it ain&#039;t my fault&quot; message on the next one.  What convinced me was the way that IE7 doesn&#039;t even support the workarounds that people were forced to invent for IE6.  That&#039;s just contemptuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, haven&#8217;t done any Web design in ages, but resolved quite some time ago to put in an &#8220;IE may display this weirdly and it ain&#8217;t my fault&#8221; message on the next one.  What convinced me was the way that IE7 doesn&#8217;t even support the workarounds that people were forced to invent for IE6.  That&#8217;s just contemptuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12840</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12840</guid>
		<description>Re browser compatibility, I know some designers who simply refuse to code IE workarounds and will put disclaimers on the site instead stating that it is not viewable in IE6.  With my latest project I&#039;m tempted to join in.

Rather intrigued by the email I got from .net stating that the latest issue is embargoed until 2 January due to a juicy exclusive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re browser compatibility, I know some designers who simply refuse to code IE workarounds and will put disclaimers on the site instead stating that it is not viewable in IE6.  With my latest project I&#8217;m tempted to join in.</p>
<p>Rather intrigued by the email I got from .net stating that the latest issue is embargoed until 2 January due to a juicy exclusive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-12839</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=2030#comment-12839</guid>
		<description>On the subject of Blu-Ray...  I&#039;ve bought a huge bloody great flat-screen TV now -- I forget just how big, 42&quot; I think -- and I still don&#039;t see any problem with DVD.  Seems like a nice high resolution to me.  I simply never get that &quot;Need to upgrade this technology&quot; feeling with DVD.  I&#039;m just hoping Blu-Ray will force the price of DVDs down even further.

Bloody stupid brand name, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of Blu-Ray&#8230;  I&#8217;ve bought a huge bloody great flat-screen TV now &#8212; I forget just how big, 42&#8243; I think &#8212; and I still don&#8217;t see any problem with DVD.  Seems like a nice high resolution to me.  I simply never get that &#8220;Need to upgrade this technology&#8221; feeling with DVD.  I&#8217;m just hoping Blu-Ray will force the price of DVDs down even further.</p>
<p>Bloody stupid brand name, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
