<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ID cards: voluntary? Only if you&#8217;ve never been on holiday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1898/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1898</link>
	<description>Freelance journalist Gary Marshall on technology, the Internet, music, Macs and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1898/comment-page-1#comment-12709</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=1898#comment-12709</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m increasingly convinced that draft legislation is badly worded deliberately.  Bad wording has enabled all sorts of things.  Only a paranoid lunatic would point out that the anti-terrorism legislation potentially gave low-level council functionaries the ability to spy on people for suspected minor infractions of minor bye-laws.  &lt;i&gt;Of course&lt;/i&gt; it won&#039;t be used for such things!  It&#039;s anti-terrorism legislation!  You know, for terrorists!  

I mean, these people write legislation for a living, they&#039;ve had years of practice, and they have help from lawyers who specialise in it and have had even more years of practice, and they spend months or even years on each one.  And we&#039;re supposed to believe that it ends up sloppily worded by accident?  I&#039;m first in line to agree that politicians are stupid and incompetent, but this is still stretching it a bit.  Especially considering the sheer ingeniosity on display when submitting expense claims for mortgage payments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m increasingly convinced that draft legislation is badly worded deliberately.  Bad wording has enabled all sorts of things.  Only a paranoid lunatic would point out that the anti-terrorism legislation potentially gave low-level council functionaries the ability to spy on people for suspected minor infractions of minor bye-laws.  <i>Of course</i> it won&#8217;t be used for such things!  It&#8217;s anti-terrorism legislation!  You know, for terrorists!  </p>
<p>I mean, these people write legislation for a living, they&#8217;ve had years of practice, and they have help from lawyers who specialise in it and have had even more years of practice, and they spend months or even years on each one.  And we&#8217;re supposed to believe that it ends up sloppily worded by accident?  I&#8217;m first in line to agree that politicians are stupid and incompetent, but this is still stretching it a bit.  Especially considering the sheer ingeniosity on display when submitting expense claims for mortgage payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mupwangle</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1898/comment-page-1#comment-12708</link>
		<dc:creator>mupwangle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=1898#comment-12708</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re exempt from having to produce documents if you&#039;ve never left the country.  Without producing documents, how do you prove that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re exempt from having to produce documents if you&#8217;ve never left the country.  Without producing documents, how do you prove that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
