<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Supersmoker: Cigs 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1599/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1599</link>
	<description>Freelance journalist Gary Marshall on technology, the Internet, music, Macs and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1599/comment-page-1#comment-12171</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=1599#comment-12171</guid>
		<description>On that basis it&#039;s worth a go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that basis it&#8217;s worth a go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1599/comment-page-1#comment-12170</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=1599#comment-12170</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why it would appeal to me - not to beat the ban or to help me give up. At the moment, I have no real intention of giving up (yeah, yeah, I know), but I would like to lower the risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why it would appeal to me &#8211; not to beat the ban or to help me give up. At the moment, I have no real intention of giving up (yeah, yeah, I know), but I would like to lower the risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mupwangle</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1599/comment-page-1#comment-12169</link>
		<dc:creator>mupwangle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=1599#comment-12169</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that there is any evidence for nicotine being a carcinogen - it&#039;s all the other stuff that does it.  Nicotine is poisonous in high enough doses, but most drugs are.  They actually reckon nowadays that nicotine might actually be good for you in small doses.

(Obviously the anti-smoking lobby is trying to supress this because they see it as a reason to smoke.  Apparently, if you have alzheimer&#039;s, nicotine might help you be more lucid for a year or two more.  But smoking still gives you cancer.  They seem to think that people will forget that bit.  Idiots.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that there is any evidence for nicotine being a carcinogen &#8211; it&#8217;s all the other stuff that does it.  Nicotine is poisonous in high enough doses, but most drugs are.  They actually reckon nowadays that nicotine might actually be good for you in small doses.</p>
<p>(Obviously the anti-smoking lobby is trying to supress this because they see it as a reason to smoke.  Apparently, if you have alzheimer&#8217;s, nicotine might help you be more lucid for a year or two more.  But smoking still gives you cancer.  They seem to think that people will forget that bit.  Idiots.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1599/comment-page-1#comment-12168</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=1599#comment-12168</guid>
		<description>Yep. Nicotine&#039;s a poison, but as far as I know it isn&#039;t a carcinogen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Nicotine&#8217;s a poison, but as far as I know it isn&#8217;t a carcinogen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1599/comment-page-1#comment-12167</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/?p=1599#comment-12167</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the point of it that it&#039;s safe, though? IE no tar and other nasty chemicals and no cancer risk. Or is nicotine also responsible for cancer? (I really should know, but I don&#039;t, and I can&#039;t be bothered to wade through Google results.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the point of it that it&#8217;s safe, though? IE no tar and other nasty chemicals and no cancer risk. Or is nicotine also responsible for cancer? (I really should know, but I don&#8217;t, and I can&#8217;t be bothered to wade through Google results.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
