Popjustice tells it like it is

I love Popjustice, especially when it publishes posts like this one. On the monstrosity that is “Samanda”:

The thing is, this is not a pop single and the two women fronting it are not pop singers. This is not a pop career. This is an example of a fairly shrewd management team building a fleetingly lucrative brand around two people, using pop music - and the pop charts - to raise profileand increase the money they can make from public appearances, endorsements and various other non-musical ventures. It’s a way of getting Samanda in the papers, on the pop TV channels, on the radio: it’s maintaining profile (and therefore earning potential) without having to pay for any advertisements.

Agree? Disagree? Then by all means leave a comment, although please note that spammers will be shot. If you subscribe to the feed you can get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

Odd that a rampantly popist site like Popjustice should take such a rockist view of this, and post essentialist nonsense like “this is not a pop single”. It is - just a rubbish one. You could argue that Samanda’s single is the inevitable result of the prevailing popist mood of recent popular culture.

I dunno, is that rockist? They’re not moaning about it being packaged; they’re moaning that the package doesn’t include a shiny pop nugget…

“They’re not moaning about it being packaged; they’re moaning that the package doesn’t include a shiny pop nugget…”

Rockism operates a high culture/low culture split - discriminating in favour of ‘proper’ music made by ‘proper bands’, and against mindless chart nonsense. As you know, I’m no fan of rockism. But I don’t like Popism either. Popism is a kind of anti-intellectualism masquerading as postmodernism. Rather than accepting pop as something which can be criticised on the same level as ’serious’ rock, it brings everything down to the lowest common denominator - rather than everything being equally worthy, everything is equally shit. How good music is becomes about it’s ‘popness’ or whatever - an essentialist value judgement.

Once you start claiming “this isn’t proper music”, you’ve exposed yourself as a rockist - just one with a different standard of what makes legitimate music.

Leave a comment


*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word