<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s said that the internet has the collective intelligence of a fourteen year old boy&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052</link>
	<description>Freelance writer Gary Marshall on technology, music, Macs and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mupwangle</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4572</link>
		<dc:creator>mupwangle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4572</guid>
		<description>Working OK at work now too.  Not that I&#039;m using the internet at work or anything. Ahem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working OK at work now too.  Not that I&#8217;m using the internet at work or anything. Ahem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4571</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4571</guid>
		<description>Oh, sure.  This is why, when designing for a client, I&#039;d always make sure it was IE6-compatible.  What I meant was that, purely for &lt;i&gt;my own&lt;/i&gt; site, I just can&#039;t be bloody bothered with it any more.  Selfish, but hey, it&#039;s mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sure.  This is why, when designing for a client, I&#8217;d always make sure it was IE6-compatible.  What I meant was that, purely for <i>my own</i> site, I just can&#8217;t be bloody bothered with it any more.  Selfish, but hey, it&#8217;s mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tm</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4568</link>
		<dc:creator>tm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4568</guid>
		<description>&gt;SP2 of XP to run IE7

It&#039;s been said before, but of course from a corporate point of view there isn&#039;t really a compelling need to upgrade from 2K to XP at all - so my company among others still has most of it&#039;s installed base on 2K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;SP2 of XP to run IE7</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been said before, but of course from a corporate point of view there isn&#8217;t really a compelling need to upgrade from 2K to XP at all &#8211; so my company among others still has most of it&#8217;s installed base on 2K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>Yes, my company still have IE6 as their default browser.  Largely because you need SP2 of XP to run IE7, something which hasn&#039;t yet been deployed across my workplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, my company still have IE6 as their default browser.  Largely because you need SP2 of XP to run IE7, something which hasn&#8217;t yet been deployed across my workplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4565</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4565</guid>
		<description>Good point, Mr TM. That&#039;s largely why old netscapes and IEs are regular visitors to the server logs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Mr TM. That&#8217;s largely why old netscapes and IEs are regular visitors to the server logs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tm</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>tm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>&gt;reminding everyone that the upgrade’s free.

of course, but IT projects to upgrade every machine in a reasonably sized company are not - so I will be stuck with it at work for some time I&#039;m afraid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;reminding everyone that the upgrade’s free.</p>
<p>of course, but IT projects to upgrade every machine in a reasonably sized company are not &#8211; so I will be stuck with it at work for some time I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4561</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4561</guid>
		<description>When I eventually get around to redesigning my site, I am sorely tempted to not bother with IE6 at all.  Just stick a footnote on the front page reminding everyone that the upgrade&#039;s free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I eventually get around to redesigning my site, I am sorely tempted to not bother with IE6 at all.  Just stick a footnote on the front page reminding everyone that the upgrade&#8217;s free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4560</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4560</guid>
		<description>Looks positively spiffing under IE7 and FF2 on Vista. Although I think it was ok on both of them before the change. I&#039;ll go away again now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks positively spiffing under IE7 and FF2 on Vista. Although I think it was ok on both of them before the change. I&#8217;ll go away again now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>Looks good to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mupwangle</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4558</link>
		<dc:creator>mupwangle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4558</guid>
		<description>This thread isn&#039;t doing it on firefox on the mac but I&#039;ll have to wait till I&#039;m back at work to check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thread isn&#8217;t doing it on firefox on the mac but I&#8217;ll have to wait till I&#8217;m back at work to check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4557</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4557</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the new one uploaded. Better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the new one uploaded. Better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052/comment-page-1#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigmouthstrikesagain.com/archives/1052#comment-4556</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I can see that it&#039;s not.

Thinking cap back on....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I can see that it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Thinking cap back on&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

